UNDANG-UNDANG IBU KOTA NEGARA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM

Abstract

The purpose to be achieved from this study is to analyze law number 3 of 2022 concerning the National Capital, both in substance and procedural with various scientific perspectives, with which it is concluded, is the law worth maintaining or returning to the government and the House of Representatives for total revision?. The results of the study can be concluded that the law on the capital of the country has been proven to have substantive and procedural defects so that it requires a complete revision, and even then it was carried out when the Covid-19 pandemic was over. Therefore, the researcher recommends two things, namely the Law on the National Capital City which has been passed should be returned to the Government and the House of Representatives for a complete revision of the causes of substantive and procedural defects, and adjusted to the results of the substance analysis that the researcher carried out, so that it can be a means of realizing the Indonesian state as baldatun thayyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur, and if the government is paralyzed until it enters an emergency condition even though there is no emergency the new state capital law, then the president uses his prerogative to move the national capital based on the previous regulatory regulations including the state emergency law, where the safety of the country takes precedence over other benefits.