URGENSI ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SEBAGAI BENTUK PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0

  • Rivaldo Fariadi Ivanda Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Shelvi Rusdiana Universitas Internasional Batam
Keywords: Online Dispute Resolution, E-Commerce, Society 5.0 era

Abstract

The era of society 5.0 is an era where information technology and humanities run simultaneously, the presence of technology in a developing society with the presence of laws that adjust to form a harmony and renewal that brings progress to Indonesia, one of which is the presence of online dispute resolution as a form of dispute resolution that is make it easier not only for entrepreneurs but for consumers who are in dispute. The presence of ODR in Indonesia is a necessity for the community due to the increasing number of people interacting with the internet, this is also encouraged as a form of efficiency both in terms of time and cost. ODR which is developing in Indonesia is also supported as an online dispute resolution with the presence of the ITE Law, Government Regulation of Trading through ES and the AADR Law. Research conducted by researchers using normative methods by collecting data qualitatively and utilizing documents, journals, books, and laws and regulations as a form of research elaboration. The data sources used are secondary data sources using writings, dictionaries and regulations as basic references. This study aims to determine the urgency of the presence of the Arbitration Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution which can be the basis for implementing Online Dispute Resolution in Indonesia, but there is a need for a law that specifically regulates this ODR so that it can focus more on disputes and their regulation

References

Badrulzaman, M. D. (2019). Kedudukan Perjanjian Baku Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15, 1–8.
Chandra, A. (2014). Penyelesaian Sengketa Transaksi Elektronik Melalui Online Dispute Resolution (Odr) Kaitan Dengan Uu Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik No. 11 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, 10(11), 80–89.
Diah, M. M. (2008). Prinsip Dan Bentuk-Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketadi Luar Pengadilan. Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 5(2), 113.
Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280
Entriani, E. (2017). Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum. Jurnal An-Nisbah, 03(02), 279–293.
Fadillah, F. A., & Putri, S. A. (2021). Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dan arbitrase. JIMIT: Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Ilmu Terapan, 2(6), 744–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v2i6.486
Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2018). Society 5.0 and Social Development: Contributions to a Discussion. Management and Organizational Studies, 5(4), 26. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v5n4p26
Gottschalk, L. (1986). Understanding History; A Primer of Historical Method (terjemahan Nugroho Notosusanto). In Understanding History; A Primer of Historical Method (terjemahan Nugroho Notosusanto) (p. 38). UI Press.
GUSTI, N. W. L. D., WIBAWAI, K. A., & ANTARA, W. (2021). Pengaturan Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Berdasarkan Konvensi New York 1958 di Indonesia. Majalah Ilmiah Hukum, 18(1), 121–127.
Harahap, I. R., & Maharani, D. (2020). Penerapan dan Pandangan Keagamaan Terhadap Undang-Undang ITE di Indonesia. 1(1), 28–31.
Harahap, K. (2021). the Online Dispute Resolution in Pancasila’S Frame. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 8(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i2.15906
Hendarsyah, D. (2019). E-Commerce Di Era Industri 4.0 Dan Society 5.0. IQTISHADUNA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita, 8(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.46367/iqtishaduna.v8i2.170
Kanedi, I., Siswanto, S., Yupianti, Y., Sari, V. N., & ... (2022). Pemanfaatan Teknologi E_Commerce dalam Proses Bisnis pada Era Society 5.0. Jurnal Dehasen …, 1(2), 99–104.
Kurniawan, S. (2019). Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Merek Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Jo. Undang Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dengan World Intellectual Proper. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi, 11(November), 97–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v11i1.1972
Maharani, A. (2020). Computational Thinking dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Euclid, 7(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v7i2.3364
Mamudji, S. (2004). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Hukum Dan Pembangunan, September, 194–209.
Mangei, R. B. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Lex Privatum, VIII(3), 54–64.
Mansyur, M. A., & Kamil, H. (2014). Kajian Hukum Online Dispute Resolution (Odr) Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v1i2.1461
Mantili, R. (2021). Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.252
Mayumi Fukuyama. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-centered Society. Japan SPOTLIGHT, August, 8–13.
Nicholas, C. (2020). Policy Choices In The Implementation Of Electronic Procurement: The Approach Of The Uncitral Model Law On Procurement To Electronic Communications. Proceedings of 4th International Public Procurement.
Oktaviani, S., & Apriani, R. (2020). Implementasi Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Tokopedia. Jurnal Hukum De’rechtsstaat, 5(3), 248–253.
Prastyaningtyas, E. W. (2019). Dampak Ekonomi Digital Bagi Perekonomian Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Manajemen Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi (SENMEA), IV, 103–108.
Putra, I. S., Santoso, B., & Benuf, K. (2012). Online Dispute Resolution sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Financial Technology di Indonesia. Simbur Cahaya, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v27i2.1035
Putri, D. E. (2020). Application of Online Dispute Resolution (Odr) in International and Indonesia Domain Names Disputes. Lampung Journal of International Law, 1(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v1i1.2021
Rahayu, A. C., Dewantara, R., & Syafi’i, R. I. R. (2021). Batasan Makna Frasa Kesalahan Teknis Dalam Pasal 57 Ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 Terhadap Keabsahan Kontrak Elektronik (The Meaning Limitation Of The Technical Errors In Article 57 Section (2) Government Regulation Number 80 Of 2019 O. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 6, 310–318.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. In Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. (19th ed., p. 240). Alfabeta.
Turagan, A. F. (2019). Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Dengan Itikad Baik Menurut Pasal 1338 Kuhperdata. Lex Privatum, VII(1), 46–51.
Widjaja, G., McVey, K. N., Justian, J., & Vena, T. (2019). Uncitral Model Law on Electronic Commerce and Model Law on Electronic Signatures. Cross-Border, 1(1), 283–296.
Y.L.R Rehatalanit. (2021). Peran E-commerce dalam Pengembangan Bisnis. Universitas Udayana, 1(1).
Published
2023-05-01
How to Cite
Rivaldo Fariadi Ivanda, & Shelvi Rusdiana. (2023). URGENSI ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SEBAGAI BENTUK PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0. Ganesha Law Review, 5(1), 13-23. Retrieved from https://semnas-fmipa.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/GLR/article/view/1770